Attorney General Pam Bondi faced some intense questions about Jeffrey Epstein during a congressional hearing last week. The exchanges quickly turned tense, and viewers were left with more questions than answers. Throughout the hearing, her responses, delivery, and overall demeanor stood out, especially given her extensive experience as a prosecutor. But what do her body language, facial expressions and word choice reveal? And what does she REALLY know? Find out now. For special channel perks, become a member of The Behavioral Arts here: https://www.youtube.com/@TheBehavioralArts/join Book my Seminar, Training or Keynote Address here: https://www.thebehavioralarts.com/ Book My Award Winning Live Show at Your Upcoming Corporate Event: https://spideymagic.com/corporate/ Check out my favorite books on how to read body language (affiliate links): https://amzn.to/4fi0MSO https://amzn.to/3TNNYdf https://amzn.to/3QWbXYp https://amzn.to/3orQNWF FInd me on: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thebehavioralarts Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/spideyhypnosis Pam Bondi's Full Hearing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxL-W41LgGk&t=15179s Checkout my video on how to get the truth out of people: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=huAvcM6Lu5c SOURCES Research on upwards movements and joy https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00990296 Palm orientation across cultures https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-Cultural-Study-of-Open-Palm-Hand-Gestures-and-Ferr%C3%A9-Mettouchi/852e013cc58d776119e18b281cecf7e6a79664ca Palm away and negationhttps://scholars.cityu.edu.hk/en/publications/vertical-palm-awayoscillate(d2a306e4-ba07-48e7-a2fd-600e1c88b9c7).html Eye blocking/ slow blink to focushttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811921002433
ADVERTISEMENT
Her behaviour was disgusting and disgraceful here.
The answer keeps her from lying under oath. A non answer is not a answer. It's a dodge.
This is why victims of sexual abuse don't come forward. You literally take your life into your own hands.
"It's ironic that she's saying that they're the ones deflecting, when this entire response is a deflection."
Nothing screams guilt louder than deflection, ad hominem attacks and sheer evasiveness when confronted with facts. Her entire 'holier than thou' demeanor, the complete and utter cheek and disrespect in that hearing was palpable. Why is her behaviour in these hearings being tolerated and not being disciplined? I got quite angry watching her to be honest.
She’s making a fool of herself. Her behavior is embarrassing. I do find the word salad, deflecting, and inability to answer simple questions to be excessively irritating.
RIP Virginia Giuffre who purposely and repeatedly stated that she wanted to live and no intention of ending her life.
Wow Spidey, you worked soooo hard to bring us this 45 minutes of GOLD. Thank you!
Not at all ironic that these committee hearings are chaired by a man with extensive expertise in concealing sex crimes.
Two words, "performative and unresponsive," Thank you, Spidey. I could not watch it by myself.
Pam Bondi knows that if she released all the unredacted documents, she'd be signing her own death warrant. Does she deserve any concern? Nope!
JUSTICE FOR THE VICTIMS AND SURVIVORS OF EPSTEIN.
Pam Bondi refused to bring criminal charges against Epstein in Florida.
If we're being honest, this calls into question every conviction that she served as prosecutor for.
Pam Bondi could not even glance at the victim's. That speaks volumes.
The release of the victim names and not the predators is because the White House was sending a message. They have no protection. And we know who they favored.
20:29 "you do a Jekyll and hyde kind of thing around here" GA congressman nailed it.
Hey Everyone! Thanks for watching and I'm really glad to see the positive feedback in the comments. There is a term I used in the video that I want to clarify. In the video I used the term "witch hunt" and I just saw 2 comments who were confused by that term because they both said that a "witch hunt" means an unmerited investigation with no possibility of guilt. That is in no way how I have heard the term used so I looked it up and none of the online dictionaries I found (including Oxford) say that it means nobody is guilty. Oxford defines it as "[...] a campaign to identify and persecute particular members of a group, organization, or society." I then asked google (gemini) if "witch hunt" means there is no guilty party and it said "no, the term refers more to the method and motivation of the investigation rather than the actual guilt." It also said that in essence it means that the accuser decided the person was guilty before the actual investigation. And that's exactly how I've heard it used and exactly how I meant it. Of course I don't think there are no guilty parties here. It's quite the opposite, I believe there are guilty parties on BOTH SIDES, I think that's been made very clear in my videos on the topic. I believe that everyone in government should be rooting to investigate EVERYONE who comes up in the files regardless of political affiliation and views. My criticism is that I feel a lot of people are using the files to villainize EXCLUSIVELY people on "the other side" while absolving people on their own side. They've already decided who's guilty and who's innocent. I think every member of congress should want a thorough investigation on EVERYONE. I just wanted to clarify what I meant by that in case anyone else felt the term meant nobody is guilty, the dictionaries and google don't seem to indicate that and it is not how I've heard it used. Sorry for the confusion if it commonly used in that context.
Releasing victim names after clearly being ask/told not to? That was nit an "accident", that was deliberate. Wow.
This country is one big circus.