► Subscribe to Sky Sports News: http://bit.ly/SkySportsNewsSub ► Watch Sky Sports with NOW: https://bit.ly/NOWSkySportsYT Sky Sports News correspondent Kaveh Solhekol discusses the possible sanctions for Manchester City after being found guilty of all charges related to serious breaches of Premier League financial rules by an independent commission. He also discusses how the appeal process could work. The club intend to appeal the decision. #SkySportsNews #SkySports #manchestercity ► For the latest developments on this story: https://qrcode.skysports.com/skysports/topstories ► For the latest transfer news: https://qrcode.skysports.com/skysports/TransferCentre More from Sky Sports on YouTube: ► Sky Sports: http://bit.ly/SkySportsSub ► Sky Sports Boxing: http://bit.ly/SSBoxingSub ► Sky Sports Cricket: http://bit.ly/SubscribeSkyCricket ► Sky Sports Darts: https://bit.ly/SubSkySportsDarts ► Sky Sports Football: http://bit.ly/SSFootballSub ► Sky Sports F1: http://bit.ly/SubscribeSkyF1 ► Sky Sports Golf: https://bit.ly/SubscribeSkySportsGolf ► Sky Sports Premier League: https://bit.ly/SubscribeSkySportsPL ► Sky Sports Retro: http://bit.ly/SkySportsRetroSub ► Sky Sports WSL: https://bit.ly/SubscribeSkySportsWSL ► TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@skysportsnews ► X: https://x.com/SkySportsNews ► Website: https://www.skysports.com ► To enquire about licensing Sky Sports content, you can find out more here: https://www.skysports.com/more-sports/news/31754/11434270/license-sky-sports-footage
ADVERTISEMENT
Kick them out the league 😂
I reckon Pep knew what was coming and got himself out of there
It’s about time Everton answered for City’s crimes.
Am I missing something but shouldn’t they be kicked out of league football and then follows investigation by HMRC and Police?
Then why didn't city just cooperate with the investigation if you knew you were innocent?🤷
Ok, when years 2019 - present will be investigated?
Expelled from the league, banned for 10 yrs. Everton had 6 points for 1 charge. City should be looking at 690 points for 115 charges. I'd give them the points deduction too. To be served whenever they get back to the premier league. This way, you'd guarantee they are out of the biggest league for 15-20 yrs at least.
Its up there with Lance Armstrong Tour de France Victorys
Jamie O’Hara is an absolute knucklehead… keep Man City in the premiership because they got the best players… mate they got the best players because they committed fraud… if other clubs could do what City did then those players would also be playing in other clubs.. City need to be demoted to Division 2, all titles won in that period automatically void and should be given a 100 points deduction this season so they will be at the bottom of the league…
The year is 2032, and Kaveh Solhekol is going to break-down how the brand of Manchester City's lawyer's suits is going to to affect the outcome of the 115 charges
Shamchester City
Make them sell the club. The Chelsea owner was made to sell his club for doing less
City relegated before gta6 ?
Is Kaven an spokesperson for Man City he first said it could take years or they could not be found guilty
This will become awkward for the UK government, and Mr Burnham who has been fairly close to UAE from their investments in Manchester and beyond
People keep just saying 9 years 9 years is up to the point it got leaked it definitely went on longer they were completely reliant on the sham sponsor money they couldn’t just stop it they would have been unable to make payments and been deep in red They need to investigate the following years i cant see how they ever would have been able to stop the sham 900 million in revenue over 9 years how do you replace that level of funds instantly legally?
Ferran did not blink once
Arteta and Pep must be mentioned in this
Send them to the Wall. Make them play in Scotland
Let's put Financial Fair Play to one side for a moment. Many of the world's biggest clubs have spent sums comparable to Manchester City over the years. The difference is that clubs such as Real Madrid, Barcelona and others built their financial power and global brands over decades, in some cases more than a century, so their level of spending tends to attract less scrutiny. There is also a broader debate about whether Financial Fair Play truly promotes competitive balance or whether it largely preserves the position of football's established elite. Some would argue that the clubs already at the top have benefited from rules that make it harder for emerging challengers to compete with them financially. It can sometimes feel like an exclusive club where the existing members decide who gets a seat at the table. Equally, questions should be asked of all major clubs, not just Manchester City. Clubs such as Chelsea, Barcelona and Real Madrid regularly complete high-profile transfers and recruit some of the world's most sought-after young talent. Greater transparency and consistency in how football finances are scrutinised would help ensure that all clubs are held to the same standard, regardless of their history, status or fan base. If City is ultimately found to have broken the rules (after the appeals), then they should face the appropriate consequences. However, once that process is complete, the wider discussion should focus on whether the current Financial Fair Play framework genuinely creates a level playing field or simply protects the dominance of clubs that have been at the top for generations.